2. Blogging and Bullokar

Before I have even started properly on the blog, I have changed my mind about what it is; consistency was never my greatest attribute. I have now decided that on this blog I shall simply present my random musings. My earth-shattering papers on various aspects of English grammar will be published on a website which I am preparing with the help of EJ of WebbDesign. STOP PRESS. We are up and running: http://www.gramorak.com

OK: Blogging and Bullokar.

My interest in the grammar of modern English led me to an interest in what grammarians of earlier generations had written about their language. Thanks to www.abebooks.co.uk (no, I don’t get a fee for that link, unfortunately), I now possess copies of  most of the significant grammars of English published since the sixteenth century. Some of them are in facsimile editions, but I did splurge out on a few originals. I also managed to download a few from other sites for nothing; that was a bonus.

I expected most of the early ones to be of historical interest, but not really relevant to a consideration of today’s English, and was therefore pleasantly surprised to find that even the earlier writers had useful points to make.

In 1586 William Bullokar, soldier, teacher, and student of law and agriculture, published his Bref Grammar for English, the “first grammar for English that ever was printed, except my Grammar at large”, as he described it in a hand-written note on the last page of his own copy. Unfortunately the Grammar at large has not survived; indeed, it may never have been printed.

Like many grammars published in the years that followed, Bullokar’s work is heavily influenced by Latin grammar but, unlike some of his successors, he recognises that different languages use different parts of speech for similar information. He is also less prescriptive than many who followed. Students until comparatively recent times, for example, have had to learn the suspect rule that the future in English is formed with shall for the first person singular and plural, and will for other persons. Bullokar more liberally presents this table (spellings modernised):

Fut   }  I shall or will        {     }  we        {shall }                                                                      tense} thou shalt or wilt { Pl } you, or  {  or   }  love                                                                sing   } he shall or will     {      } they      {will   }

He is also ahead of some later writers by defining parts of speech by meaning, collocation with other words and form:  a noun is the name of anything that may be seen, heard, felt or understanded ….. it may the easilier be known from every other part of speech by some one of these articles , A, An or The, set before such word. ….. The singular number speaketh but of one: as, a house. … The plural number speaketh of more than one: as, houses.

He also recognised that people then (as now)  used what some still consider to be ‘incorrect’ language: The comparative [of the adjective] being more properly used in comparing of two together: the superlative used in comparing of more, though we English use the superlative also when we compare but two things together.

If later writers had been as non-prescriptive as Bullokar, generations of students might have been spared much pointless labour.

It was also interesting to discover that Bullokar in his Booke at large (1580) anticipated in his attempts at spelling reform Webster, Shaw, Pitman and others. (It is true that he was not alone in this area; his near-contemporaries Cheke and Hart also proposed more logical spelling systems. All, except Webster with some of his suggestions accepted in the United States, unfortunately failed).

To suggest that students of modern English should study Bullokar would be silly; he was writing about a language spoken  four and a quarter centuries ago. His work is, however, a salutary reminder that perceptive ideas about English grammar were around before the 20th century.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s